Charges Dismissed Against Utah Plastic Surgeon Amid Controversy

Crowd protesting for vaccine choice with various signs

News Summary

In a surprising turn of events, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the dismissal of charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, a Utah plastic surgeon. Dr. Moore had faced serious allegations related to COVID-19 vaccine fraud, including the destruction of government-supplied vaccines and issuing fraudulent vaccination certificates. Supporters have hailed him as a champion of patient choice, while critics question the ethics of his practices. The controversy reflects a larger national debate over vaccination policies and government intervention during health crises.

Salt Lake City, Utah – On July 14, 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the dismissal of charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, a plastic surgeon in Utah, during the ongoing trial in Salt Lake City. Dr. Moore had faced serious allegations related to COVID-19 vaccine fraud, including the destruction of over $28,000 worth of government-supplied vaccines and issuing at least 1,937 fraudulent vaccination certificates.

The charges were dismissed midway through the trial, significantly altering the trajectory of the case that had garnered national attention. In addition to the aforementioned charges, Dr. Moore was accused of administering saline shots in place of actual vaccines to minors, reportedly at the parents’ requests. His indictment occurred in 2023, amid a larger investigation by the Department of Justice into vaccine-related fraud cases.

Aside from the fraudulent activities, the charges included conspiracy to defraud the United States and illegal disposal of government property, which painted Dr. Moore’s actions as not only unethical but also criminal under U.S. law. However, Bondi’s announcement has led to polarized opinions, with supporters hailing Moore as a defending champion of patient choice and critics questioning the integrity of his practices.

Following the announcement, Bondi took to social media to express her belief that Dr. Moore had provided his patients with choices that she perceives the federal government was unwilling to offer. She noted her gratitude towards various right-wing advocates, including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Mike Lee, for their support and calls for the charges against Dr. Moore to be dismissed.

Greene had previously characterized Dr. Moore as a “hero” for his stand during the pandemic, reflecting the broader divide in political and public opinion regarding COVID-19 protocols and vaccine administration. The controversy surrounding Moore has not only reignited discussions on vaccination policies but also highlighted the contrasting responses from different governmental administrations regarding public health crises.

According to Dr. Moore’s attorney, Kathy Nester, the dismissal of the charges was based on evidence indicating that their client did not commit the alleged criminal acts, but rather upheld the medical choices of his patients. This perspective clashes with the views of critics, who argue that his actions were reckless and posed risks to public health.

The political environment has shifted significantly as the handling of COVID-19 has become more contentious over the years. Many have criticized Dr. Moore’s actions, believing that regardless of the dropped charges, he holds some culpability for his role in allegedly undermining public health measures. This incident adds another layer to the ongoing debates regarding vaccine skepticism fueled by high-profile political figures.

Dr. Moore’s trial comes after two years of scrutiny and investigation by federal authorities. Furthermore, recent comments from notable figures, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have commended Moore’s actions while simultaneously contradicting established public health guidelines and recommendations. The contradictory narratives surrounding COVID-19 responses underscore the deepening divides in American society regarding vaccination and health policies.

Moore’s case, among others during this challenging period, emphasizes the complexities and conflicts over health care and government intervention. As support and criticism for his actions continue to swirl, the outcome of this case could have lasting implications for vaccine policies and the legal landscape surrounding medical practices in the United States.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Additional Resources

STAFF HERE INDIANAPOLIS WRITER
Author: STAFF HERE INDIANAPOLIS WRITER

INDIANAPOLIS STAFF WRITER The INDIANAPOLIS STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREIndianapolis.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Indianapolis, Marion County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as the Indianapolis 500, Indy Jazz Fest, and the Indiana State Fair. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Indy Chamber and Visit Indy, plus leading businesses in motorsports and healthcare that power the local economy such as Indianapolis Motor Speedway and IU Health. As part of the broader HERE network, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Indiana's dynamic landscape.

ADD MORE INFORMATION OR CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ARTICLE CLICK HERE!
Advertising Opportunity:

Stay Connected

More Updates

Would You Like To Add Your Business?

Sign Up Now and get your local business listed!

WordPress Ads